<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gilmour Knotts Chartered Accountants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Avoid capital gains as they trigger taxes.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=64</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=64#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one always surprises me. What it boils down to is that people including experienced business people are afraid of income taxes. So when they hear &#8220;capital gains&#8221; tax, they assume it is going to be big and they try &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=64">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div></div>
<p>This  one always surprises me. What it boils down to is that people including  experienced business people are afraid of income taxes. So when they  hear &#8220;capital gains&#8221; tax, they assume it is going to be big and they try  to avoid it. In actual fact, capital gains taxes are almost the lowest  personal income taxes.</p>
<p>Here are the personal income tax rates at the top tax bracket in B.C.</p>
<p>Salary and interest                         43.7%<br />
Dividends from large corporations    18.5%<br />
Dividends from small corporations    31.6%<br />
Capital gains                        21.9%</p>
<p>So  unless you can arrange to get all of your income from large  corporations as dividends, the best rates are capital gains rates.</p>
<p>My advice to clients is to actually look for capital gains because of the lower tax rates.</p>
<p>The concept is very similar for corporations but is harder to  illustrate. Please feel free to become our client and ask our advice on  this issue.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=64</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Get corporate life insurance.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=62</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=62#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is usually excellent advice. In our opinion, every business owner should have some insurance to cover their biggest risk. That is the risk of their own death or disability or a key person&#8217;s death or disability. The problem lies &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=62">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div></div>
<p>This  is usually excellent advice. In our opinion, every business owner  should have some insurance to cover their biggest risk. That is the risk  of their own death or disability or a key person&#8217;s death or disability.</p>
<p>The problem lies not in the purchasing of the insurance, but in the setting up of the paperwork that goes with the insurance.</p>
<p>In term life insurance there are five key people to think of:</p>
<p>1) The person you are insuring<br />
2) The beneficiary of the insurance if the insured person dies<br />
3)The owner of the life insurance<br />
4) The life insurance salesperson<br />
5) The Chartered Accountant</p>
<p>Let me tackle these in the same order:</p>
<p>1)  The most common mistake I see here is missing insurance on some owners.  For example, let&#8217;s say a husband and wife own a company. The mistake I  see is only buying insurance on the husband. The logic often is that the  wife might be working at home and is &#8220;less critical&#8221; to the business.  The reality in our opinion is that the wife is often equally important  because of the &#8220;domino effect&#8221;. In a family, if a family member dies,  the rest of the family grieves and also picks up that person&#8217;s load. The  husband will be affected by the death of the wife and some insurance  could certainly help.</p>
<p>2)  The most common mistake we see here is that the beneficiary is not the  company. In almost all cases, the beneficiary should be the company.  There is an important detail though. This detail is that the company  must have a plan in place in its shareholders agreement to pay the  insurance out to the surviving shareholders and family. This is the  second most common mistake we see. We see that the shareholders  agreement is missing or incomplete when it comes to talking about  corporate life insurance.</p>
<p>3)  The owner of the insurance is more important with other types of  insurance for example, &#8220;universal life&#8221; insurance. In term insurance it  is generally set up that the beneficiary is the owner. However, each  case is unique and this should be reviewed before the policy is set up.  The reason for doing this review in advance is that changing the  ownership of a policy can trigger tax.</p>
<p>4)  The life insurance salesperson is critical to the proper setting up.  Too often I hear stories of &#8220;quick sales&#8221; with no follow-up on the  related documentation like the shareholders loan mentioned above. This  can mean that although you have insurance, it is owned by the wrong  people or payable to the wrong people.</p>
<p>5)  The Chartered Accountant should be contacted early in the process to  ensure that details like the shareholders loan are considered and  attended to. I can say that many of my clients call me so they can &#8220;pick  my brain&#8221; on this topic.</p>
<p>Feel free to become our client and &#8220;pick our brains&#8221; on this topic.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=62</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Take the capital gains exemption.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=59</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=59#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the &#8220;core&#8221; retirement planning objectives of many business owners I meet is to sell their company for a lot of money and get the proceeds tax free thanks to the Capital Gains Exemption for &#8220;Qualified Small Business Corporations&#8221;. &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=59">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div></div>
<p>One  of the &#8220;core&#8221; retirement planning objectives of many business owners I  meet is to sell their company for a lot of money and get the proceeds  tax free thanks to the Capital Gains Exemption for &#8220;Qualified Small  Business Corporations&#8221;.</p>
<p>The catch is that few business owners stop to check if they are actually owners of &#8220;Qualified Small Business Corporations&#8221;.</p>
<p>A few surprises that I have seen are:</p>
<p>The  business owner didn&#8217;t own the company that they sold. It was actually  owned by another family member or by a holding company. As a result, the  business owner didn&#8217;t get the cash or didn&#8217;t get the Capital Gain  Exemption and perhaps neither did the other family member or the holding  company (generally holding companies do not get this special  exemption).</p>
<p>The  company being sold wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;Qualified Small Business Corporation&#8221;. The  business owner didn&#8217;t consult with a properly qualified accountant  before making the sale.</p>
<p>The company being sold was not a corporation at all. It was an unincorporated division of something or somebody else.</p>
<p>If  you stop and take a look at the actual cost of making a mistake here,  it is worth taking to a properly qualified accountant first.</p>
<p>On  a $2 million dollar sale price for a business that was started for $1,  we are talking about a minimum of approximately $1,640,000 and a maximum  of approximately $437,000</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=59</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Get a health plan, it saves taxes.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=55</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=55#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another &#8220;perk&#8221; that many employers look at for their employees. It can have a significant impact on the level of &#8220;satisfaction&#8221; that an employee feels. There are good ways and better ways to provide a health plan and &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=55">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This  is another &#8220;perk&#8221; that many employers look at for their employees. It  can have a significant impact on the level of &#8220;satisfaction&#8221; that an  employee feels.</p>
<p>There are good ways and better ways to provide a health plan and similar benefits to employees.</p>
<p>A  good way for example is to make a plan available to employees on the  basis that the employee pays for it. Although this might not sound  great, it can actually be good for the employees because now they can  get health or disability or other benefits that are very difficult to  buy on a &#8220;one off basis&#8221;. They also should be getting a discount from  the price of a &#8220;one off&#8221; plan because of the group benefit concept of  pooling risk and costs.</p>
<p>What  sometimes is assumed to be better is to have the employer pay for the  package. This certainly will save the employee costs up front but can be  very expensive in the long run because the benefits might be what we  call &#8220;taxable benefits&#8221;. This means that the employee is considered to  have received a benefit equivalent to the value of the plan and this is  added to the employee&#8217;s income. This can have a backlash effect on the  employees if it is audited by CRA and the employees have some unpaid  taxes.This can be made even more complex if the employees and employers  split the cost of the plan. (50% / 50%) for example. Without clear  documentation the employee could end up with all the tax cost and no one  gets the tax savings.</p>
<p>The  best plan it to have a professional accountant (like our firm) go  through the proposed benefits with you and determine if they are  &#8220;taxable benefits&#8221; or &#8220;non-taxable benefits&#8221;. We find this works very  well in plans where the employees and the employers share the costs. The  employers pay for the &#8220;non-taxable benefits&#8221; and the employees pay for  the &#8220;taxable&#8221; ones.</p>
<p>There  are actually a lot of details in managing employee plans and there are  some very tax effective ways to reduce taxes; for example Private Health  Services Plans. The catch is that they are complex to set up correctly  and if set up incorrectly can have a big tax cost.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=55</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Get incorporated. It save taxes.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=51</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=51#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often times an entrepreneur will consult a lawyer and an accountant when starting a new business. They will also consult a few experienced friends in the business world. One piece of advice I see people receiving and following is to &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=51">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often  times an entrepreneur will consult a lawyer and an accountant when  starting a new business. They will also consult a few experienced  friends in the business world.</p>
<p>One  piece of advice I see people receiving and following is to incorporate  their businesses for the tax savings. On the surface, this seems like a  good idea because the highest corporate tax rate is a bit over 30% and  the highest personal tax rate is 44%. As well, the lowest corporate tax  rate stretches all the way from $1 of income to $400,000 of income. That  rate is 13%. When you compare 13% to 44%, you tend to jump to the  conclusion that incorporation is the way to go.</p>
<p>The  devil is in the details they say. On the surface, the tax rates are  much different. However, there are other costs to consider besides tax.  One very important one is the cost of compliance. I can tell you that a  business that is unincorporated might have an annual accounting bill of  $500 while a similar incorporated business might have an annual  accounting bill of $2,500. There are other costs as well. For example,  lawyers and bookkeepers (not to be confused with accountants).</p>
<p>A  rule of thumb we use in our office is that each owner must have a  taxable income of over $60,000 before it makes economic sense for income  and other taxes to incorporate.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=51</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Don&#8217;t file. After all, you don&#8217;t owe taxes!</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=45</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=45#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In business, the paperwork can be overwhelming to say the least. We find many clients will put paperwork in order of importance. This makes sense. However, sometimes there are consequences that you do not anticipate. For example, we see clients &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=45">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In  business, the paperwork can be overwhelming to say the least. We find  many clients will put paperwork in order of importance. This makes  sense.</p>
<p>However,  sometimes there are consequences that you do not anticipate. For  example, we see clients that do not owe tax on a tax return decide to  wait and file it when they have more time. This can have nasty  consequences. Let&#8217;s say for example that your business decided not to  file its corporate tax return when it was due six months after the year  end. Let&#8217;s also say that you know with certainty that your corporation  has already paid enough taxes so filing late will not trigger a penalty.  What you do not necessarily know is how this will affect your other  filings with Canada Revenue Agency. There is a rule in place that says  in short, &#8220;if you miss one filing for one department, then all  departments will hold back refunds until all filings are up to date&#8221;. So  let&#8217;s say your business is expecting a GST refund. Well, that GST  refund will be held until the corporate return is filed and assessed.  This can mean a delay of many months if you are expecting a refund.</p>
<p>Worse  yet, if you get very late on filings, Canada Revenue Agency can take  matters in their own hands and file tax returns with estimated numbers.  These returns will still not release the held funds, instead they will  add to the amounts considered owing and make it even less likely that  you will receive a refund when you file a tax return that indicates a  refund.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=45</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Multiply the small business tax rates. It saves taxes.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=40</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=40#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before 2005, there was a significant double taxation burden placed on business owners that earned over $300,000 in their corporations. To help avoid this, business owners would seek ways of &#8220;multiplying&#8221; the small business tax rate. This was the lowest &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=40">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before  2005, there was a significant double taxation burden placed on business  owners that earned over $300,000 in their corporations. To help avoid  this, business owners would seek ways of &#8220;multiplying&#8221; the small  business tax rate. This was the lowest income tax rate for corporations  and at the time, it only applied to income up to $300,000. Now it  applies to income up to $500,000.</p>
<p>I  have seen schemes where husband and wife would own parallel businesses  out of the same office. Or friends and family would be brought in as  co-owners to &#8220;multiply&#8221; the small business limit. At the time, there was  a significant reward in lowering the potential tax rate of 60% on  income over $300,000 by 10% or more. The rules changed however and the  rates changed as well so that now we can expect a combined tax rate  maximum of under 45% in British Columbia. The problem with these schemes  today are that they are still being practiced when the tax savings is  almost nil % and the risk of penalties and interest if caught is very  high.</p>
<p>Let us show you how we can keep your rates lower by using the small business rate and eligible dividends to your best benefit.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Provide a car to a staff person. It is a non taxable benefit.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=34</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=34#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s competitive hiring market for employees, many employers are trying to find good incentives to lure and keep great employees. One popular one is the &#8220;company car&#8221;. The tax rules used to be very prohibitive in this area. The &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=34">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In  today&#8217;s competitive hiring market for employees, many employers are  trying to find good incentives to lure and keep great employees. One  popular one is the &#8220;company car&#8221;.</p>
<p>The  tax rules used to be very prohibitive in this area. The rules have now  changed and I can say that in many circumstances, a company car is a  cost effective &#8220;perk&#8221;. The problem is that it is not a universally good  thing. We find that employees with under 50% business usage of the car  are almost never better off than they would have been if you had just  given them a raise to match the car costs. We find that it is a bit of a  sliding scale between 50% and 100% business usage and that at the top  (90 to 100%), it makes business and tax sense. In the middle, we have to  look at it on a case by case basis.</p>
<p>The caution here is don&#8217;t just assume that a company car is a tax effective form of a benefit.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=34</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2) TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID Donate from your corporation. It saves taxes.</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=25</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the corporation make the donation or should an individual make the donation? We recommend that in most cases, an individual should make the donation not a corporation. This is because in most cases, the individual will get an almost &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=25">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the corporation make the donation or should an individual make the donation?</p>
<p>We  recommend that in most cases, an individual should make the donation  not a corporation. This is because in most cases, the individual will  get an almost 44% tax refund for making the donation and in most cases  the corporation will get an 13% tax deduction for making the donation.  Which would you rather have, 44% or 13%?</p>
<p>Do you donate a product or service or do you donate cash or something else?</p>
<p>Many  people are in favour of donating a product or service. The reason is  often that the donation is worth more than the actual cash cost to the  donor. This is because the donor is the business that makes the product  or provides the service and they might donate something worth $100 that  actually costs them $80. The difference is the normal profit on the  item. You might think this is great! I get to claim $100 but it only  cost me $80. Canada Revenue Agency can catch this missing $20. The  reason is that the &#8220;sale&#8221; of the donated product or service is supposed  to be recorded on the books of the corporation or individual at market  value (the same value as recorded on the donation receipt). Sometimes,  the corporation missed recording the sale altogether and actually had a  donation receipt and inventory shrinkage recorded. This is a form of  &#8220;double dipping&#8221;. In the past, when I told clients about this, they were  skeptical that Canada Revenue Agency would ever be interested or catch  it. Unfortunately, I have to report that two years ago, Canada Revenue  Agency has started requesting full documentation from donors. They are  requesting not just the donation receipt, but also &#8220;proof&#8221; of payment.  For example, a cheque or in the case of donated products or services,  other proof like invoices, etc.</p>
<p>Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
<p>We are Professional Corporate Tax Accountants / Advisors</p>
<p>Chartered Accountants serving Langley, Surrey and Abbotsford British Columbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=25</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top ten tax saving strategies to avoid &#8211; Use the corporation to pay for everything. This avoids putting taxable income in the owner&#8217;s hands</title>
		<link>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=14</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilmourknotts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOP 10 TAX SAVING STRATEGIES TO AVOID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilmourknottsca.wordpress.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The strategy is simple. Have your corporation pay for expenses that you might have paid for personally. For example, if you are looking at putting an office in your basement so that you can work from home, have your company &#8230; <a href="http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?p=14">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;">The strategy  is simple. Have your corporation pay for expenses that you might have  paid for personally. For example, if you are looking at putting an  office in your basement so that you can work from home, have your  company pay for it. Or if you are having a company barbeque party at  your home, have the company buy a new barbeque. When the party is over,  leave the barbeque at your home. Or go on a trip and charge it to the  business. Is it a business trip or a pleasure trip? The problem is that  all of these can be taxable shareholder benefits under Section 15 of the  Income Tax Act of Canada. In plain English that means these purchases  made by the company are taxable to the shareholders. What is worse is  that they can be double taxed. If an auditor finds these benefits to the  shareholder paid for by the company, they can not only tax the  shareholder for the benefit received, but they can deny the deduction to  the company. This is double taxation.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">How  do you fix this? It is almost impossible in my experience to fix this  once it is done and found by the CRA auditor. However, there is some  grace given if you find it yourself and act to fix it before it even  comes before an auditor. You can also work with your accountant to use  legal methods to get similar benefits at reduced tax rates.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Contact us at partner@gilmour.ca or www.gilmour.ca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilmour.ca/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=14</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

